In spherical coordinate system, the Laplacian is
![]() |
(73) |
Writing the solution of Laplace's equation
in the form
, we have
![]() |
(74) |
Using the variable
instead of
, the equation for for
becomes
![]() |
(75) |
Combining the solutions
and
, we define orthonormal set of
functions
With this, the differential equation for the radial function
is
Collecting these results, the general solution of Poisson's equation in spherical
coordinate system can be written as
![]() |
(76) |
As an example consider the problem in which the potential on two hemispheres of a
conducting sphere of radius a is maintained at
and
. We choose z-axis
so that the northern hemisphere has potential
. Then the potential does not
depend on
. Further, the potential must vanish at infinity. So the potential
can be written as
The coefficients
's and
's are obtained by using the boundary condition at
. The coefficients for even
's vanish and for odd
's
and
. We therefore have
![]() |
(77) |
![]() |
(78) |
As another example of the application of spherical coordinate system consider a
conical conducting surface held at zero potential. Let
be the opening
angle. For
, we are interested in the computation of potential
inside a conical hole inside a conductor. For
, on the other
hand, we have a conical conducting surface projecting out ( see Fig
(2.6.3)). We choose z axis along the direction of the axis of the cone
so that, in spherical coordinate system
and
. The potential is independent of
and therefore
or
. The differential equation for
is
|
For integral values of
the functions
are the Legendre
polynomials having
zeros between
and
. For nonintegral values
of
,
. As
increases, the value of x at which
vanishes increases continuously. In any case,
to have
at least one zero between
and
. For example, as
increases from
0 to 1, the zero of
moves from
to
. Our problem
requires that the potential vanishes at
. This can happen for
a number of values of
, say
and then the solution for the
potential can be written as
![]() |
(79) |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(80) | ||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
(81) |
If we are interested in the solution at small value of
( i.e. the tip of
the cone ), the coefficients
's should be zero as the potential should
be nonsingular. Further, for the same reason, the smallest power of
corresponding to
would dominate and the behaviour of the potential and
field can be understood in terms of that term. Thus, we shall choose
Let us first consider
increasing from
0 to
, so that
decreases from 1 to 0. The value of
at which
vanishes decreases from infinity to 1. Thus, for
between
and
( corresponding to a conducting cone drilled in a
metal ), the leading term in the potential is
with
between
and 1. The electric field is then proportional to
. This means, the potential and field valishes as a power law
near the tip of the cone. Further, the Gauss theorem implies that the induced
charge density at the tip of the cone also vanishes as a power law. When
is
, the potential is linear in r and the field is constant.
This is the same result as that for the conducting plane.
For
increasing from
to
, the geometry is like a
conducting wireprojecting into space. For this case,
decreases from 1
to zero and the electric field behaves as
with
for small r. Thus, the electric field becomes singular near the tip of the
cone. This also means that the induced charge density becomes singular at the
tip.
This result explains the functioning of lightening arrestor. The lightening arrestor has a pointed conducting material. The presence of charges in the atmosphere induces charge density on the arrestor. This charge density is very large at the tip of the arrestor and that helps in inducing electrical breakdown resulting in a discharge between the atmospheric charge and the lightening conductor. Since the conductor is grounded, the discharge is safely conducted to the earth.